Naming Conventions
Common naming conventions to keep your flows and tasks well-organized and consistent in Kestra.
Namespace Naming Convention
We recommend using the company.team
naming convention for namespaces to maintain a well-organized and consistent structure across your workflows. This pattern helps in the following ways:
- Centralized governance for credentials
- Sharing configurations across namespaces
- Simplified Git sync
Why we recommend a company.team
namespace structure
By having a root namespace named after your company, you can centrally govern plugin defaults, variables and secrets and share that configuration across all other namespaces under the company root.
Adhering to this naming convention also simplifies Git operations. You can maintain a single flow that synchronizes all workflows with Git across all namespaces under the parent namespace named after your company.
The next level of namespaces should be named after your team (e.g., company.team
). This structure allows for centralized governance and visibility at the team level before further dividing into projects, systems, or other logical hierarchies. When syncing your code with Git, that nested structure will be reflected as nested directories in your Git repository.
Example Namespace Structure
Here is an example of how you might structure your namespaces:
mycompany
mycompany.marketing
mycompany.marketing.projectA
mycompany.marketing.projectB
mycompany.sales
mycompany.sales.projectC
mycompany.sales.projectD
Should you use environment-specific namespaces?
We generally recommend against using environment-specific namespaces (e.g., dev
, prod
, staging
) because it can lead to several issues such as:
- Dev and prod not fully separated: a development workflow running out of memory could impact the production instance.
- Duplication of configurations: you may end up duplicating configurations across environments, which can lead to inconsistencies.
It's recommended to use separate Kestra instances to separate dev and prod environments.
Summary
The company.team
namespace structure will help you to facilitate a logical, easy to maintain hierarchy, and will make it easy to sync your workflows with Git. To reliably separate dev and prod environments, use separate Kestra instances or tenants.
ID Naming Convention
We recommend using the same convention across all IDs:
- Flows
- Tasks
- Inputs
- Outputs
- Triggers
Subscript notation and valid characters in IDs
Kestra doesn't enforce any naming convention. For example, if you want to use the URL-style naming including hyphens, Kestra supports that. However, keep in mind that IDs for flows, tasks, inputs, outputs and triggers must match the "^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_-]*"
regex pattern. This means that:
- you can't use any special characters except for hyphens
-
and underscores_
- when using hyphens, you need to follow the format
"{{ outputs.task_id[your-custom-value].attribute }}"
when referencing that ID in output expressions; the square brackets[]
in[your-custom-value]
is called the subscript notation and it enables using special characters such as spaces or hyphens (as in thekebab-case
notation) in task identifiers or output attributes.
We recommend using the snake_case
or camelCase
conventions over the kebab-case
, as they allow you to avoid the subscript notation and make your flows easier to read.
Snake case
Snake case is a common naming convention in programming. It's popular among Python developers in the data science, AI and data engineering domain.
Here is an example of a flow using the snake case convention to name IDs for flows, inputs, outputs, tasks, and triggers:
id: api_python_sql
namespace: prod.marketing.attribution
inputs:
- id: api_endpoint
type: URL
defaults: https://dummyjson.com/products
tasks:
- id: fetch_products
type: io.kestra.plugin.core.http.Request
uri: "{{ inputs.api_endpoint }}"
- id: transform_in_python
type: io.kestra.plugin.scripts.python.Script
containerImage: python:slim
beforeCommands:
- pip install polars
warningOnStdErr: false
outputFiles:
- "products.csv"
script: |
import polars as pl
data = {{ outputs.fetch_products.body | jq('.products') | first }}
df = pl.from_dicts(data)
df.glimpse()
df.select(["brand", "price"]).write_csv("products.csv")
- id: sql_query
type: io.kestra.plugin.jdbc.duckdb.Query
inputFiles:
in.csv: "{{ outputs.transform_in_python.outputFiles['products.csv'] }}"
sql: |
SELECT brand, round(avg(price), 2) as avg_price
FROM read_csv_auto('{{ workingDir }}/in.csv', header=True)
GROUP BY brand
ORDER BY avg_price DESC;
fetchType: STORE
outputs:
- id: final_result
value: "{{ outputs.sql_query.uri }}"
triggers:
- id: daily_at_9am
type: io.kestra.plugin.core.trigger.Schedule
cron: "0 9 * * *"
Camel case
Camel case is another common naming convention in programming. It's popular among Java and JavaScript developers. Let's look at the same flow as above, but using the camel case convention:
id: apiPythonSql
namespace: prod.marketing.attribution
inputs:
- id: apiEndpoint
type: URL
defaults: https://dummyjson.com/products
tasks:
- id: fetchProducts
type: io.kestra.plugin.core.http.Request
uri: "{{ inputs.apiEndpoint }}"
- id: transformInPython
type: io.kestra.plugin.scripts.python.Script
containerImage: python:slim
beforeCommands:
- pip install polars
warningOnStdErr: false
outputFiles:
- "products.csv"
script: |
import polars as pl
data = {{outputs.fetchProducts.body | jq('.products') | first}}
df = pl.from_dicts(data)
df.glimpse()
df.select(["brand", "price"]).write_csv("products.csv")
- id: sqlQuery
type: io.kestra.plugin.jdbc.duckdb.Query
inputFiles:
in.csv: "{{ outputs.transformInPython.outputFiles['products.csv'] }}"
sql: |
SELECT brand, round(avg(price), 2) as avgPrice
FROM read_csv_auto('{{workingDir}}/in.csv', header=True)
GROUP BY brand
ORDER BY avgPrice DESC;
store: true
outputs:
- id: finalResult
value: "{{ outputs.sqlQuery.uri }}"
triggers:
- id: dailyAt9am
type: io.kestra.plugin.core.trigger.Schedule
cron: "0 9 * * *"
Both conventions are valid and it's up to you to choose the one you prefer.
Was this page helpful?